“Another Damn Election”

People’s Party official charged with assault in Justin Trudeau stone-throwing

Liberal candidate apologizes after requesting $300 fee to appear on election-related community panel

She’s learned Justin’s MO!

TORONTO — After back-to-back debates this past week, new polling shows the Liberals have seen a jump in support.

The Saturday polling numbers from Nanos Research, commissioned by CTV News and The Globe and Mail, show that Justin Trudeau’s Liberals have moved from 31.3 per cent to 34.4 per cent from Thursday.

The jump of 3.1 percentage points marks the biggest single-day jump for the Liberals since the beginning of the campaign and brings the party 0.2 percentage points ahead of where the party started the campaign.

I am not believing this.

An election in a sovereign democracy should be more than a toy for the nation’s leader, and the inner circle of advisers who make up his court, to play with.

It should be something far more than the outcome of raw calculation by the two or three “heavies” in the back office of what advantage it might produce for the “boss.” And, not incidentally, guarantee their tenure as shamans of the PMO.

Conservatives dump Toronto candidate over Islamophobic tweets

Her former riding seems pretty much out of reach for the Con’s no matter who they ran if the last results are anything to go by.

TORONTO — With the leadership debates now in the rear-view mirror and polls showing a close race between the Liberals and Conservatives, the issue of vote-splitting is becoming increasingly significant ahead of the Sept. 20 federal election, according to pollster Nik Nanos.

“If you’re [Conservative Leader] Erin O’Toole and play fantasy politics, you’d say ‘what would the world look like without Maxime Bernier?’” Nanos said on Friday’s edition of CTV’s Trend Line podcast. “On the other side of that we’ve got the NDP. I imagine there’s quite a few ridings where Justin Trudeau might be sweating, considering NDP support.”

Vote splitting can only happen between similarly aligned parties. In Canada the CPC and LPC are not much different from one another and the NDP is simply their weird cousin.

There is no vote splitting between the CPC and the PPC, the CPC is liberal the PPC conservative.

Trudeau calls debate question on Quebec’s secularism law ‘offensive’

Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau said today a question asked during last night’s English debate regarding Quebec’s secularism law was “offensive.”

The debate kicked off with a fiery exchange between Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet and debate moderator Shachi Kurl over Bill 21 — which bans some civil servants, including teachers, police officers and government lawyers, from wearing religious symbols at work — and Bill 96, which would make French the only language needed to work in the province.

“You denied that Quebec has problems with racism yet you defend legislation such as Bills 96 and 21 which marginalize religious minorities, anglophones and allophones. Quebec is recognized as a distinct society but for those outside the province, please help them understand why your party also supports these discriminatory laws,” asked Kurl.

Whoever wrote the questions for last night’s leaders debate — the only one we’re to get in English — wasn’t fooling around.

The first question out of the mouth of moderator Shachi Kurl for Liberal leader Justin Trudeau had the tone of an angry detective confronting his main suspect.

Here it is in full: “Because you wanted a new mandate you plunged the country into an election even as the pandemic spurs thousands of new cases. But over the last 18 months opposition parties have largely stood with you, putting the nation above parties. Why aren’t you doing the same? How can you justify an election at this time?”

The Trudeau government is on record that it will increase the number of immigrants from 300,000 in 2018 to 411,000 in 2022. This increase will have serious implications for the three hottest-button issues of the 2021 election: the high cost of housing, the inadequate capacity of medical and other public facilities, and climate change. Yet in their campaign documents, none of the three major parties discusses the effects of immigration on these issues or promises to change existing immigration levels or policies. Canadians deserve better.

That’s because Immigration policy in Canada is not designed to benefit citizens. It is designed to benefit the corporate and political class. Mass immigration is baked in to our “mainstream” political parties vote whoring identity politics platforms. LPC or CPC – They have been happily undermining Canadian society for decades.

Only Bernier’s PPC has tackled this destructive fraud being perpetrated against citizens.

Bernier’s talk of ‘tyranny’ echoes far right militia group’s slogan, say experts

People’s Party of Canada Leader Maxime Bernier has been using a phrase in speeches and in tweets similar to one used by members of a far-right militia group — some of whom participated in the storming of the Capitol Building in Washington earlier this year.

Experts who monitor online extremism say Bernier’s repeated use of the phrase — “When tyranny becomes law, revolution becomes our duty” — could be interpreted by members of some far-right extremist groups like the Three Percenters as an endorsement.