“Net-Zero Tyranny”

A REPORT by five independent, eminent scientists has blown apart the myth of catastrophic climate change, destroying the case for Net Zero in the process.

Judith Curry, Roy Spencer, Ross McKitrick, John Christy and Steve Koonin are all highly respected leaders in their respective fields. Their report was commissioned by the US Department of Energy (DOE) but written with no editorial oversight by the DOE and with no political influence whatsoever. Although it specifically covers the US, its findings have worldwide ramifications.

More here …

Devastating US Report Lays Bare The Abuses Of ‘Settled’ Climate Science And Its Role In Net Zero

Net Zero is dead in the United States and the last rites have been administered in the devastating official report from the Department of Energy. Released earlier this week, the report cancels the decades-long censorship imposed by so-called ‘settled’ climate science. It is compiled by five eminent scientists and is a systematic take-down of the claims, methodologies and motivations driving activist scientists, politicians and opinion formers promoting the hard-Left Net Zero fantasy. Despite its ground-breaking importance, to date it has been largely ignored by mainstream media including the BBC and Guardian.

DOE report link – Critical Review of Impacts of GHG Emissions on the US Climate July 2025 DOE

h/t DA and DS

Net Zero is dead in the United States and the last rites have been administered in the devastating official report from the Department of Energy. Released earlier this week, the report cancels the decades-long censorship imposed by so-called ‘settled’ climate science. It is compiled by five eminent scientists and is a systematic take-down of the claims, methodologies and motivations driving activist scientists, politicians and opinion formers promoting the hard-Left Net Zero fantasy. Despite its ground-breaking importance, to date it has been largely ignored by mainstream media including the BBC and Guardian.

The U.S. Department of Energy recently commissioned a “red team” climate report by a group of respected experts: Judith Curry, John Christy, Roy Spencer, Steve Koonin, and Canadian economist Ross McKitrick. The report raises serious doubts about the idea of a looming climate catastrophe — yet it’s been largely ignored by mainstream media.

In a move that has sent shockwaves through the environmental policy world, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed to rescind greenhouse gas emissions standards for vehicles under the Clean Air Act. This is not merely a regulatory rollback, but a fundamental rethinking of the legal and scientific basis for environmental regulation in America.

An accompanying climate assessment report from the US Department of Energy provides the scientific rationale for the rollback. It will make for uncomfortable reading for those who think that green policy should be based on ideology rather than a clear-headed assessment of the facts, but it is a vital document for bringing clarity to a subject often clouded by dogma.

Heatwaves in the UK, floods in Texas and wildfires in southern Europe have all been held up as portents of a coming climate apocalypse. Ed Miliband, the UK energy secretary, warned earlier this month that the British ‘way of life’ is under threat and ‘no sector or part of society is immune from those risks’. But is climate change really proving to be as dangerous as the eco-alarmists claim? And can it justify the extortionate costs of Net Zero, the drive to decarbonise every aspect of our lives?

Only 4% of Canadians think climate change is our top problem. But many of them are hard-core activists ready to block projects

Over the past several months, public concern about climate change has declined dramatically, replaced by newfound enthusiasm for the development of Canada’s vast oil and gas reserves. The federal government is now under mounting political pressure to expedite the construction of pipelines to tidewater that will bring economic growth, employment, energy security and funding for social programs or tax relief.