Canada’s Inferno of Incivility
We stand at a precipice where we face the danger of losing our humanity forever.
Years from now, what I will remember most about the pandemic is not a virus but our response to it. We have become an intolerant, contemptful, rude and savage society, more inclined to cut off our relationships at the knees than to massage the joints a little to keep them moving. We threaten instead of persuade, mandate instead of respect, and gaslight, scapegoat, and insult our targets into submission.
Seared into my memory are the bold, black letters on the front page of The Toronto Star last August: “I have no empathy left for the wilfully unvaccinated. Let them die.” These words are, unfortunately, more aligned with today’s rules of behavior than an exception to them. Online and off, we are becoming a crude, insensitive, and morally bankrupt society being slowly engulfed, it seems, by an inferno of incivility.
Canada’s Digital ID Plans “Uncomfortably Close” To Chinese Social Credit
A constitutional rights group has blasted the federal government’s plan to create a Digital ID infrastructure as a threat to Charter rights and a step towards implementing a Communist China-style social credit system.
In the report titled Canada’s Road to Beijing, the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) outlines how China’s mass surveillance system operates and in what ways a national Digital ID system is a step towards authoritarianism.
National Council Of Canadian Muslims Has Trudeau Running In Circles
One year after the submission, NCCM inform our Liberal government of the degree to which the Feds lived up to their standards:
“Although much has been done, much more remains.”
If ever there was a calling card for Canada’s diversity industry, this is the one. They must remain insatiable. This way, political power will continue to accumulate ad infinitum. It has become the defining characteristic of post-modern society: those who whine most successfully, win.
Kamala Harris says words that definitely mean something. Scientists are just not sure what they mean yet and will be puzzling over them for centuries to come. pic.twitter.com/W6kZqeCQ14
— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) August 15, 2022
Liberals Hated The Espionage Act. Then The FBI Used It Against Trump
For the warrant to cover the Espionage Act, there had to be PROBABLE CAUSE of espionage.
Not just a “what if Trump gave classified docs to foreign agents.”
There was PROOF presented to the judge — witness testimony, video footage, other documents, something. Tangible proof.
— Tristan Snell (@TristanSnell) August 12, 2022
Prominent Democrats and left-leaning journalists have developed a newfound appreciation for the Espionage Act — which they once criticized as being unconstitutional and abusive — now that it’s being used against former President Donald Trump.
The FBI raided Trump’s residence at Mar-a-Lago Aug. 8 as part of an investigation into a potential violation of the Espionage Act, which can be used to prosecute illegal spying but also leaking or mishandling classified documents. Liberals once widely opposed the law, which they viewed as an infringement on free speech and a way for the government to abuse its critics.
One Year Later: How The Biden Admin, Big Tech, And Pfizer Fooled Americans Into Taking “FDA Approved” Covid Vaccines That Never Actually Existed
It has been almost one year since the FDA gave full approval to Pfizer’s mRNA COVID injection. Yet many will be surprised to find out that this particular vaccine, in FDA approved form, has never actually existed, and will never exist. The Biden Administration’s highly touted FDA approval was a mere sleight of hand. It was bureaucratic trickery. There remains no FDA approved COVID vaccine that is actually available in the United States, and there may never be one.
Why Is The UN Promoting A Kind Of Food Production Proven To Reduce Yields, Raise Prices, And Topple Governments?
The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) describes itself as “the global authority that sets the environmental agenda… and serves as an authoritative advocate for the global environment.” Through its “Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for Agriculture and Food” program launched in 2014, the UNEP advocates that nations “steer away from the prevailing focus on per hectare productivity.”
