Last night, right after the filings dropped, I did a long series of posts about Filing #61, where Durham tells the court why certain evidence – including Sussmann’s Feb. 7 2017 trip to the CIA to give them an updated version of the Alfa Bank hoax, a visit in which he essentially repeated the exact same crime for which he is charged, should be admitted into his trial.
What is important to note is that while Durham is calling this a conspiracy he also says ‘even though it hasn’t been charged.’ This is either a massive hint that Hillary is headed for big trouble or, if Durham does not pursue charges, the greenlight for Trump to use the filing in his civil suit against Hillary.
For about 10 minutes this week, it was like the good old days for state-run media — they thought they had finally gaffed him this time, Donald J. Trump, the great orange whale that the Captain Ahabs of fake news have been pursuing all these years.
“As recently as late last year, Mr. Biden confided to his inner circle that he believed former President Donald J. Trump was a threat to democracy and should be prosecuted, according to two people familiar with his comments,” the report read. “And while the president has never communicated his frustrations directly to Mr. Garland, he has said privately that he wanted Mr. Garland to act less like a ponderous judge and more like a prosecutor who is willing to take decisive action over the events of Jan. 6.”
Former President Donald Trump on Thursday, in filing a lawsuit against the major players who he charged crafted the Russiagate hoax, is taking on the job that the law enforcement and intelligence agencies of the U.S. Government declined to do.
When we wrote about the media effort in 2018, specifically the collusion between the intelligence and national security agencies of the United States government, I asked the question, “Do we really think such a catastrophic level of corrupted journalism could reconstitute into genuine reporting of fact-based information?” The answer then, as now, is the same, NO. Indeed, it has only gotten worse in the past four years.
For those who care about our country’s future but don’t want to be buried in the minutia of the Russia collusion hoax scandal, here is your big-picture primer.
Virtually all Americans believed, until the inauguration of Donald Trump as president on January 20, 2017, that when someone became president, he could begin to implement his agenda. Certainly Old Joe Biden’s handlers have done so with a vengeance since they took over; but when Trump became president, he immediately began to encounter resistance from entrenched members of the government bureaucracy who refused to do as he ordered. Some worked actively against Trump, while the establishment media assured us that these self-appointed “deep state” saboteurs were the courageous guardians of “our democracy.” At his South Carolina rally Saturday night, Trump continued to tease a 2024 run and made a new promise about how he would break the power of the unelected “deep state.”
COMMENT: Former national security adviser John Bolton that he believes Russian President Vladimir Putin was “waiting” for a possible United States withdrawal from NATO, claiming former President Donald Trump would have likely made such a move had he been reelected, The Hill reports.
I also see that Steve Bannon is going after Hannity for jumping off the Putin wagon and also Pence letting the orange turd know he is also. They eat their own in the republican party…
CN
REPLY: Bolton was a plant in the Trump Administration. The Deep State selected Trump’s cabinet. I am not speculating. I myself was asked to take the position of Chief Economic Adviser during the Bush Jr. Administration and declined. Bolton is a warmonger. He came out against Trump because he wanted to exit Afghanistan. I went to Mar-a-Lago for a private dinner and I was shocked. It was the very first time I EVER heard a president say it bothered him to send letters to parents and received bodies of American soldiers who died in Afghanistan and he said for what? “They have been fighting over borders for a thousand years. What difference are we going to make.” Never have I ever heard any president concerned about American life.
While the world focused on Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine last week, little attention was paid to the ineffably consequential decision by Democrats to go all-out in their assault on American democracy.
Just as Julius Caesar invited civil war by crossing the Rubicon, the partisan House committee investigating the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol let it be known that it will recommend bringing two sets of criminal charges against former President Donald Trump regarding the 2020 election. One allegation is that that he tried to obstruct the lawful counting of votes. The other is that he engaged in a conspiracy to defraud the United States through his false claims of a stolen election.
The spying began in early 2016 as a robust opposition research tactic of the Hillary Clinton campaign and transformed into an “insurance policy” to handicap the Trump Administration after his unpredictable victory.
Waving sanctions in front of Russian leader Vladimir Putin will not be enough to stop the invasion of Ukraine, according to former President Donald Trump, who said he fears that war in Ukraine could be a prelude to a wider conflict.
We’ve been talking about the incredibly disturbing implications of Special Counsel John Durham‘s court filing that identified Michael Sussmann and Rodney Joffe as the Clinton campaign contact and the ‘inside man’ so to speak for weeks now. It was Joffe who illegally “exploited” his access sensitive to the internet traffic pertaining to Donald Trump’s Residence, Trump Tower, and the WhiteHouse’s Executive Office of the President of the United States to gather “derogatory information about Donald Trump”. But independent journalists Techno Fog’ and Professor Margot Cleveland seem to have nailed it down: Sussmann and Joffe passed illegally gathered information from the Trump Campaign and the Trump Transition team to the CIA.
The two prosecutors leading the Manhattan DA’s investigation into former President Trump and his business abruptly resigned on Wednesday – after having mysteriously stopped presenting evidence to a grand jury a month ago, according to the New York Times, citing people with knowledge of the matter, and suggesting the future of the high-stakes inquiry has been thrown into “serious doubt.”
