As ideology takes a back seat to intergroup competition, the future of ethnic conflict in America is going to look more like the past
The divisive racial ideology that dominated American politics for the past decade is dying. Led by minority activists and white progressives, “woke” ideology promoted a Manichean struggle between a coalition of the BIPOC, an acronym for “Black, Indigenous, and people of color” (assumed to be natural allies) against what the BIPOC Project calls a hegemonic system of “white supremacy, patriarchy and capitalism.” But this vision of Black and white racial conflict, while still influential in universities and elite institutions, keeps getting rejected by American voters—as happened in political referendums on issues like policing and immigration, and most recently in the triumph of “normies” and centrists in the midterm elections.
Does this mean that Americans should expect a new era of kumbaya racial harmony? Not likely. Rather, the future may look more like the past, as America reverts to an older style of ethnic politics in which ideology takes a back seat to practical concerns and different groups compete over resources like jobs and the spoils of government spending.
A Durham Regional Police officer has been ordered to work an additional 60 hours after taking aim at the police chief on Instagram.
Canada’s top feminist, Justin Trudeau, has put his blackface days behind him in order to promote a more progressive insult – womanface. Earlier this month, the new trailer for TV drag competition Canada’s Drag Race: Canada vs the World teased a special appearance from Canada’s prime minister. Although without make-up, Trudeau was perhaps the biggest clown of 
The school system is going to hell.
On a video call in early November, employees at Alameda Research dialed in to learn the fate of the trading firm, which was teetering on the brink.
