
Investigative journalist and author of Willful Blindness Sam Cooper has again gone public discussing a Chinese research paper that analyzes Beijing’s impact on Canadian elections.

Investigative journalist and author of Willful Blindness Sam Cooper has again gone public discussing a Chinese research paper that analyzes Beijing’s impact on Canadian elections.

In this episode of Try to Control Your Shock and Amazement…
Any objective adult with a fair amount of rational ability and common sense can clearly see the Democrats’ grand plan behind the Biden-Harris border crisis: import as many illegal aliens as they can get away with, naturalize as many as possible as soon as possible, which would give them to vote, and, voilà: a majority of them become new Democrat voters — for the foreseeable future, anyway.
That said, an unknown number of illegals have already been voting.
In one such case, the Justice Department recently announced that an alien has agreed to plead guilty to several charges of stealing a U.S. citizen’s identity, and illegally voting in multiple elections, including primaries and general elections, in addition to illegally obtaining a passport.

Why do Democrats continue to insist that election fraud does not exist — and that such “baseless claims” have been “debunked” — when prominent Democrats insisted (in 2017 and 2018 and 2019 and 2020) that election fraud does exist and it’s a very big problem?

Leftists fell in love with all-mail elections in 2020. Now they want to make vote-by-mail permanent.
Transforming our country’s elections into a mail-in fiasco is a big step toward handing power over elections from the states to the federal government, empowering professional activists, inviting fraud, and damaging America’s constitutional system. It places the integrity of the republic in the hands of the U.S. Postal Service, the government agency that routinely delivers your neighbor’s mail to your house. And it promises to undermine public trust in electoral outcomes from now until doomsday, which could make the problems of the 2020 election routine.

Canada’s chief electoral officer has issued a wide-ranging report on the last two federal elections that calls for action to crack down on hate groups, improved regulation of third parties and new laws to make it illegal to spread disinformation about elections and voting.
Unless you’re a liberal.

The day after the 2020 presidential election, I predicted the left was going to target any attorney who dared to get involved challenging election fraud. They’d already started successfully targeting conservative attorneys, it just hadn’t gotten much attention yet. Since most people are bored by legal issues, they fly under the radar. I wrote about it over a year ago, and things have gotten far worse since then. This year, they launched “The 65 Project” to brazenly accomplish it, named after the 65 lawsuits Trump-affiliated attorneys filed after the election.

At the first 2022 Conservative Party leadership debate, although a lot of attention went to Pierre Poilievre for his skillful takedown of Jean Charest, Dr. Leslyn Lewis also made a big impact by demonstrating that she can land solid punches on the debate stage.
It has been a growing trend with Dr. Lewis since her 2020 leadership run where she has felt less rehearsed and artificial in interviews, and been willing to directly call out the legacy media for perpetuating fake news. Now we see she is even willing to get into scrapes over contentious issues on the debate stage when she sees the truth as having been obscured.
Although there is a lot of crossover between those who support Dr. Lewis and Poilievre, it was important at this debate for Lewis to decisively differentiate herself, and she did that on both the Freedom Convoy and social issues.

Isn’t it interesting how the elites attempt to divert attention to race whenever the public starts to get angry about the failed economic policies of the establishment?

It’s not ‘undermining confidence’ to point out when institutions like the Bank of Canada make serious errors, it’s an essential part of the accountability that must exist in a democracy.

French President Emmanuel Macron is set to go head-to-head against far-right candidate Marine Le Pen in a runoff later this month, after the two secured the most votes in the first round of France’s presidential election.
🇫🇷The first exit polls of the elections in #France. pic.twitter.com/TCM5qv42ck
— NEXTA (@nexta_tv) April 10, 2022

The protests that rocked Canada are over, but they have undermined Canadians’ faith in their government and hurt the image of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, new polling shows.

Of course he will. With a single word, the fate of our country is laid out before us. The fact that three-time winner Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says he is going to run for office again should surprise no one.

Arizona Senate candidate Jim Lamon’s campaign released a Super Bowl ad on Thursday depicting him in armed “showdown” with Democratic leaders including incumbent Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly (D).
The 30-second ad features actors depicting Kelly, President Biden, and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).
“The good people of Arizona have had enough of you, it’s time for a showdown,” Lamon, who plays himself in the ad, says.
The Democratic figures then draw their weapons and Lamon shoots at them, prompting them to run away.

A recent Angus Reid poll informs us that “one-in-three Canadians strongly disapprove of Trudeau, while only 6 per cent strongly approve of him. The Liberal Party runs ahead of him.”
And they are going to keep on running– more than likely forever. Thus revealed is an ill-considered element of federal politics. Justin Trudeau could stay or go. Political pundits speak of the fact that no prime minister has ever served four consecutive terms.
They don’t speak of the fact that no PM in history has ever done what Trudeau has done. As a politician, he is unprecedented — starting with his elevation of non-Canadians above and beyond the Canadian-born.
The Liberals will not lose the next election. If Trudeau does run, he will win. If a new party leader is appointed, they will win.